News


Movers & Shakers In Healthcare - QTR 2

December 19, 2018

New South Wales


David Bergman  recently joined Catholic Healthcare in Sydney as their CFO. David brings extensive executive level leadership credentials to this role, most recently from his 11 years with Calvary Health (LCM). David joins Catholic Healthcare at a time of exciting growth and development of the business, infrastructure and the team.


Professor Elizabeth Sullivan  joins the University of Newcastle, NSW in February 2019 as the new Deputy Head of Faculty, for the Faculty of Health and Medicine. Professor Sullivan is an internationally renowned scholar and distinguished Professor of Public Health, and most recently held the role of Assistant Deputy Vice Chancellor Research (ADVCR) at the University of Technology, Sydney. Prior to this, she held senior academic appointments at UNSW.


John Gibbs stepped down as CEO of Pacific Smiles Group in October 2018, after 14 years at Pacific Smiles and 11 years in the role. He has been succeeded by Philip McKenzie , who was previously CEO of Audiology Management Group, a leading audiology services business, as well as Widex, one of the world’s largest manufacturers of hearing aids.


John Slaven  joined Mid North Coast Local Health District as their new Director of Finance. John is a highly experienced Health Services CFO and most recently led Finance, Business and Operational Services at Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Queensland.


Josh Keech  recently joined The Benevolent Society in Sydney as their Executive Director of People, Culture and Engagement. Josh’s track record of leading innovation and sustainable organisational growth within the human services sectors is one of the many attributes he brings to the role.


Kelly Doran  joined Ochre recruitment as General Manager in November 2018. Kelly is a highly motivated executive with 20 plus years of combined health care, sales operations and medical recruitment experience.


Professor Maralyn Foureur  joins the University of Newcastle, NSW in February 2019 as the new Professor of Nursing and Midwifery Research, working closely with the Hunter New England Local Heath District and other key stakeholders. Professor Foureur brings world class research credentials and contemporary academic leadership, developed from her previous roles with University of Technology, Sydney and other international appointments.


Pete Lomas  recently joined Potential (x) as Client Relationship Manager, one of several recently created roles within this growing organisation focused on healthcare data, analytics and consulting. Pete brings extensive client relationship and technical skills honed from his previous roles in medical devices, diagnostics and pharmaceuticals.

 

Queensland


Alison Deans  joined Ramsay Health Board as Non Executive Director in November 2018. Alison has more than 25 years’ experience in senior management – founding and launching eBay in Australia in late 1999 and establishing clear market leadership and profitability within 18 months. 



Ben Deverson  joined the AEIOU Board of Directors as Non Executive Director in August 2018. Ben is an experienced senior executive with 21 years’ experience across numerous industry sectors including professional services, infrastructure, defence, resources and the public sector.


Dr Claudia Sussmuth Dyckerhoff joined Ramsay Health Board as Non Executive Director in October 2018. Claudia has expertise in market growth strategies, business development, and operational performance improvement in hospitals, and extensive global experience in hospitals and health care across Europe, Asia, and the USA.


Lincoln Hopper  joined St Vincent’s Health Services as CEO – Aged Care Services in August 2018. Prior to this role, Lincoln was working in the disability sector as CEO and Company Secretary for MS Queensland. Lincoln has worked in the health and community services sector for the last 28 years.


Richard Boys  joined the Endeavour Foundation Board as Non Executive Director in September 2018. Richard is a highly experienced and qualified CFO with over 30 years of exposure in the energy, mining and resources sectors.


Richard Haire  joined the Endeavour Foundation Board as Non Executive Director in October 2018. Richard’s career has spanned accountancy, merchant banking, finance, chief executive and global executive roles, in primary production, agricultural marketing and commodity companies.

 

Victoria


Alistair Barkhouse , a 25-year veteran of global pharmaceutical and healthcare organisations, was appointed General Manager Sales & Marketing at Medical Developments International in October. Al brings with him a track record of strong commercial results and success in world leading product launches across a variety of therapeutic areas.


Brian Gordon  will be joining Bionic Vision Technologies as Chief Scientific Officer in January 2019. After an extensive career at Cochlear, Brian will be leading the research, development and manufacturing process for a ‘bionic eye’ to help restore vision to the blind.


Chris Forbes  joined Kidney Health Australia as their new CEO in October of this year. Chris’s leadership experience in the commercial and For Purpose sectors as Chief Executive Officer at Ticketek Australia and Chief Commercial Officer at Swimming Australia will be invaluable in driving growth through new revenue pathways and breaking new ground in the area of early detection and prevention.


Dale Fisher  has recently commenced her new role as CEO of Silver Chain Group, responsible for leading this national organisation on its next phase of growth and development. Dale previously led Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre as CEO, steered the Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre (VCCC) redevelopment project, oversaw the transition to Peter Mac’s new home in Parkville, and built the service and research capacity of the enterprise.


Damian Gibney , recent Divisional Director - Emergency, Medicine & Cancer Services and General Manager Sunshine Hospital – Western Health, has been appointed to the role of Executive Director, Clinical Excellence and Systems Improvement at The Royal Women's Hospital. This role will provide executive and strategic leadership to the quality and safety function at the Women's as well as oversight of service improvement initiatives.


Lisa Lynch,  Chief Operating Officer at Women’s and Children’s Health Network SA, is returning from Adelaide to Melbourne to take up the role of Executive Director Clinical Operations at The Royal Women’s Hospital in 2019.


In October, former General Manager Service Development - Calvary Healthcare,  Tim Watts , was appointed to the position of Chief Operating Officer at Stile Education.

 

Western Australia


Anthony Smith  has recently been appointed as MercyCare’s new Chief Executive after an extensive career with St John Ambulance including 6 years as Deputy Chief Executive Officer. Anthony has a track record in delivering commercial success and societal impact in roles across community services and member-based organisations. Anthony will continue to drive the strategic growth of the organisation.


Elizabeth Barnes  has joined 360 Health + Community as their new Chief Executive after a successful career as Chief Executive Officer with Directions Disability Support Services. With extensive corporate and clinical governance experience Elizabeth is tasked with driving real, long term change to 360 Health + Community’s customers.


Ian Carter, after 25-years has announced his resignation as Chief Executive of Anglicare WA, to be succeeded by Mark Glasson, the Group’s Director of Services. Prior to joining Anglicare WA in 2013, Mark spent many years in a range of human services organisations, as well as holding senior executive positions for the Government of Western Australia.


Jacqui Thomson  has recently been announced as the new Chief Executive of the Ability Centre. Jacqui previously held the position of General Manager Lottery Operations at Lotterywest together with various strategic roles expanding 16-years.


John Atkins,  Western Australia’s former Agent General to the UK and Europe, has taken on the role as the new Chair of Anglicare WA. Mr Atkins replaces John Barrington and will play a crucial part in the successful transition in CEO leadership.



Rebecca Brown , former Deputy Director of Health has been appointed as the new Director General of Western Australia’s industry and tourism department, the Department of Jobs, Tourism, Science and Innovation. Rebecca has extensive experience across the public sector, holding senior positions in a range of departments. Most recently Rebecca successfully oversaw transformational change within Health to deliver better outcomes for the community.

Share this Article

Recent Articles

By Michelle Gardiner • October 26, 2026
A board career is a fantastic one for those who love strategy and working across a range of sectors and settings, but the mental load shouldn’t be underestimated. Senior executives gathered in Brisbane earlier this month for our latest Pathway to the Boardroom event, where we were joined by Craig Manson and Jo Willoughby . We returned to some of the ground covered at our recent events from a different angle, and further explored the risks facing directors, different board settings and the realities of the role. Seven themes stood out. The first few board roles take time The move into the boardroom is situational and can follow a career crossroads. A board opportunity presenting soon after leaving an executive role can be taken as a sign that the timing is right. It can also be driven by realising the demands of executive life no longer suit you and choosing to pivot your career into the boardroom. Getting your first few board roles can take a long time, and your decisions need to be made purposefully. You should be prepared for a long journey and ready to stay open and curious. Caution matters too when considering opportunities: risk profiles need to be aligned, and the unintended consequences of an opportunity need to be thought through. It is important to be in a position to sustain yourself financially while your portfolio builds. Is a not-for-profit a good way to start? One perspective is that not-for-profit boards are a poor starting point given they tend to carry higher risk profiles and can lack the resources to protect their directors. Advisory boards can be a better pathway, and you can contribute expertise without being responsible for big decisions. Another view is that a not-for-profit is the easiest way to begin. It gives you clarity on your own risk appetite, a good grounding in governance, and informs your view on building your portfolio. However, not-for-profit boards will not necessarily help you get your first commercial board role. Understanding your value proposition Be clear about where you can add value from a governance perspective and just as clear about where you cannot add value. Your value proposition changes over time, so revisit it regularly and keep a focused perspective on what you can credibly deliver. The same discipline applies to the board resume, which is different to an executive resume: short, sharp and specific, and not written through an executive leadership lens. Show how your core executive competencies translate into a board governance role and keep updating it as your value proposition evolves. Know the board before you join it Due diligence before joining a board means looking at past board minutes, reports, the organisation’s financials, and using informal networks to reference and gather information on the company. It also means meeting with past directors and the management team, and gathering intelligence from other people in the organisation. A listed environment is intense and subject to high scrutiny. Going through a listing can be taxing on executive teams, and as a director you spend substantial time on compliance. There are continuous disclosure requirements, and the stakeholder gaze is constant. Government boards are also high scrutiny with a lot of reporting, though the personal accountability differs. Your obligations as a director don’t change, it is just a different cadence in a listed environment. In private organisations, you get slightly closer to the organisation with more hands-on involvement than in listed environments. Founder-led organisations are different again. No two founders are the same, and you need to be clear on your own risk appetite, as you are taking on legal risk as well as personal and professional risk. It is important to understand upfront the founders’ motivations and alignment to the business, as once a founder takes money from investors it is no longer solely their business. Go in with your eyes open and be prepared for what comes next. Whatever the organisation, you need to enjoy what you are doing and understand whether you and the organisation can deliver the expected outcomes, and the investment case you will be held accountable for. Being able to ask the right questions is key There is constant change with emerging technology and AI, and boards need to think about how to engage with the different technology skillsets. You are expected to know about AI, data, and how to protect an organisation against cyber threats, so being an educated generalist on these matters who knows enough to ask the right questions is key. That means continuing to upskill for as long as you are on a board. Boards also need transformation and change capability, which comes from directors who have run organisations, can work through ambiguity and change cycles, know their customers and can bring the customer voice to the boardroom. Directors must be able to read and interrogate financial statements to ask the right questions. Behavioural skills are harder to assess. Humility and integrity are important, as is the ability to build connection with other directors: being collegial, open-minded and emotionally intelligent. Good directors have firm opinions but are open to feedback and ultimately changing their opinion. The dynamic and effectiveness of the board are crucial, and the culture around a board table must be right. An effective Chair is crucial to a board’s success The relationship between the Chair and the Chief Executive Officer is critical. A Chair who understands what it is like to be a Chief Executive Officer can make a great mentor. A good Chair is curious, is motivated by wanting to build a great team, and is a unifier and driver who asks the right questions. How a Chair manages differences of opinion and robust conversations is critical to the success of the board. A good Chair is always a step ahead when it comes to succession planning. It should always be top of mind, because thinking about where the next generation of leaders will come from matters for the sustainability of the organisation. The job is always on You are always on call, and you never know what will come up next. You have to be accessible and prepared to be available whenever you are needed, and the mental load is real. You’re not in it for the money; you do it for the love of the work. For those who enjoy strategy and working with organisations to help them make better decisions, it can be very rewarding. _________________________________________________________________________ The conversation on what it means to be board ready continues, and Brisbane added the question of fit: which type of board setting suits the risk a director is willing to carry, and what the role will ask of them once they are on it. Our thanks to Michelle Gardiner , Managing Partner – Board practice at Derwent, for hosting the morning, and to Jo and Craig for sharing their experience with such practicality and honesty. Continue the conversation For further insights or to explore how Derwent can support your organisation's approach to board composition and succession, connect with our team at brisbane@derwentsearch.com.au . To register your interest in future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au .
By Michelle Gardiner • October 12, 2026
Senior executives gathered in Sydney last month for our Pathway to the Boardroom event, a programme now in its second decade of helping executives become board ready. We were privileged to be joined by Jacqueline Chow and Sylvia Wiggins who discussed what the transition from executive life to the boardroom actually involves and what it demands once you're there. Six themes stood out. The path looks different for everyone. The journey to becoming a Non Executive Director is individual and varied. For some, it starts with the realisation that they can create more impact in the boardroom than as an executive leader. Often this comes with a preference for the breadth of a board role, over the narrower focus of life as an executive. For others, it follows an event that prompts a deliberate rethink of their career. Not every board is going to be right for you. One thing some directors wish they had known at the beginning of their journey is that not every board is the right fit for you personally. The pathway involves a lot of rejection, and it takes maturity to reflect on what you have to offer as well as personal interest. Boards appoint based on what the organisation needs, so a rejection reflects a decision made in the board's interest rather than a judgement on the individual. It's also important to do due diligence on boards before joining. Non negotiables for joining a board include hygiene issues such as financials and legal but testing the people and culture of a board is imperative, this includes checking who among your own network has already worked with people on that board. Board culture reflects both an ability to vigorously debate ideas and a commitment to board solidarity to make a collective decision. A successful board is comfortable with both. The skillset is different. Skills that serve well in an executive career don't automatically transfer to the boardroom. Early on, a new director may be eager and want to ask lots of questions, but in a boardroom, what adds the most value is listening and adding a considered perspective. At a board meeting some of the most impactful directors can often sit quietly for most of a board meeting and make one well-judged contribution that makes a pivotal difference to the decisions made. The mindset shift matters too, in the executive world, a role carries responsibility for a function, but board directors are accountable for the whole organisation, which includes identifying contradictions, such as a growth target that conflicts with the risk appetite. Board composition expectations are shifting. The skills matrix is evolving. Finance, legal, governance and industry expertise remain core, but emerging skills such as cyber, work health and safety, and AI, once viewed as a specialty sitting with one expert board member, are now shifting to an expectation that all board members must understand. Directors need to be diligent about upskilling, particularly in AI, which is changing how organisations do business. Behavioural attributes matter just as much as technical capability: relentless curiosity to understand what is happening in the organisation, the confidence to change your mind and be challenged in your thinking, and a collaborative style comfortable with viewing the board as a collective that gains from the diversity of everyone in the room. Succession planning must be continuous. Boards need to discuss succession planning continuously to ensure it is orderly and timely, whether in response to volatility in the world, or externalities that require a transformational pivot. This includes carefully considering the timing of bringing on a new director. Chief Executive Officer succession is a particular challenge, requiring a balance between people feeling safe in their roles and the reality that a CEO who is well regarded today may not continue to be the right person for the organisation in a fast changing environment. The importance of building strong relationships can't be underestimated Trust is the foundation of a well-functioning board. In a crisis, directors rely on colleagues who will commit time and energy to resolving the problem as a team, and who can be counted on to ask the hard questions. That confidence has to be built well before it is needed. Because board members typically meet once a month or less often, relationships need deliberate attention, such as volunteering for a committee together, suggesting a webinar or inviting a fellow director for a coffee. _________________________________________________________________________ Our thanks to Michelle Gardiner , Managing Partner at Derwent, for hosting the morning, and to Jacqueline and Sylvia for such generous, practical insight into the realities of board life. Continue the conversation For further insights or to explore how Derwent can support your organisation's approach to board composition and succession, connect with our team at sydney@derwentsearch.com.au . To register your interest in future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au .
By Lindsay Every • September 23, 2026
By most measures, this is the fastest adoption of a transformative technology in human history, and the pace itself, more than the tools, is what's testing leaders right now. The question we explored at our AI & The People event in Perth last week wasn't whether to engage with AI, it was how quickly leaders could learn to work through the ambiguity it creates – adapting their leadership style and their team's dynamics on the move, without the luxury of mastering every technical detail first. A shift which asked a lot more of leaders than most changes they've led before. We were lucky to have both Peter Tonagh , Executive Chair at Quantium, and Jacky Connolly , Chief People Officer at CBH Group, join the conversation. Five key themes stood out. The energy is there. The paradox is what happens next. Most people aren't resistant to AI, they're cautious, and the caution has more to do with job security than the technology itself. Some roles changed materially enough to bring the challenge of redeployment. For most people though, roles simply changed shape, and the job for leaders is to harness that energy rather than manage it down. Underneath that sits a harder problem. The productivity paradox. Individuals are getting faster and better at their jobs with AI, but those personal gains rarely show up as enterprise level returns. Team members without proper support will find their own workaround – bringing in their own unsanctioned tools or leaving for an organisation who gives them a better one – so the case for organisations investing properly is not really a choice. Lead it from the top. Guard it just as fast. This is an organisational problem before it's a technology one. Business models are set by leaders, not technologists, and senior people being visibly comfortable using the tools is what gives everyone else permission to engage with them. The common myth is that graduate roles are most at risk, however the real risk sits with middle management – executives will become more productive and carry more direct reports, resulting in fewer layers in between. Guardrails need to be set fast rather than perfected in advance, particularly around the risk of losing intellectual property. Starting with a small set of approved tools, and expanding as trust builds, is better than waiting for a comprehensive policy before allowing any use at all. Boards need to be brought in early too, so they understand their own obligations from the start rather than being briefed after the fact. AI tools tend to agree too readily. Adjusting the settings to instruct the tool to push back and challenge assumptions, instead of defaulting to agreement, was raised as a small fix that can help improve decision quality. Bring the whole workforce. Not just the office. AI tools in organisations work when technology and people are treated as one problem. Leaders need to understand the tools well enough to drive change through them, rather than leaving it to IT alone. Frontline and operational team members matter just as much as corporate functions: practical wins like rostering and attendance carry real weight, and leaving teams behind undermines the case for AI everywhere else in the business. There is also a real shift reshaping recruitment. Hiring is moving away from purely skills-based selection towards attributes: curiosity, critical thinking, persistence, agility, and optimism. It's a genuine move back toward classical study, backed by heavier investment in structured training to bring people onto the same page. Claim the gain. Then change how you measure people. The strongest examples of AI delivering enterprise value tend to be simple and specific – one tool that is purposefully built and applied across the organisation, is better than everyone building their own individual version of the same thing. But individual productivity gains don’t redirect themselves. Organisations need to actively claim the time being freed up and decide what it's used for, rather than leaving the decision to individuals. That same discipline needs to extend to how performance is measured. Early adopters should be rewarded for bringing others along and sharing what they’ve learned, not just for their own output. A cost-out mentality, or pitting people against each other, will corrode culture quickly. Redesign the work. Don’t just hand out the toolkit. The most common mistake organisations make is retooling an existing process rather than redesigning the work itself. Give someone an AI tool without rethinking their role, and the result is usually chaos, not efficiency. The real gains come from pairing someone who understands the AI tools with someone who deeply understands the work, then letting them rebuild roles and workflows together from first principles. New competitors are already emerging built exactly this way – a key consideration for any organisations still only automating. One example was given of a leader building a personal "digital twin", an AI trained specifically on their tone, feedback style, and decision-making patterns. It was developed over approximately 200 hours, though the benefit was felt within the first couple of hours of use. Six leadership principles had already been documented; the AI was then used to interview and draw out roughly 30 more. The tool is now used for communications, coaching a wider team, and personally – including when weighing a difficult decision while tired. The organisations that get this right won't be the ones with the best AI. They'll be the ones whose leaders go first – closing the gap between individual and enterprise gains, setting guardrails fast, bringing the whole workforce with them, and redesigning the work rather than just the toolkit. _________________________________________________________________________ Our thanks to Lindsay Every , Group Managing Partner at Derwent, for hosting the morning, and to Peter and Jacky for such generous, on-the-ground insight into what AI adoption looks like. A special thanks to Julie Colvin , Managing Partner – Perth, and our Perth team for their support in bringing this event to life. Continue the conversation For further insights or to explore how Derwent can support your organisation's approach to AI and workforce transformation, connect with our team at perth@derwentsearch.com.au To register your interest in future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au .
Show More
By Michelle Gardiner • October 26, 2026
A board career is a fantastic one for those who love strategy and working across a range of sectors and settings, but the mental load shouldn’t be underestimated. Senior executives gathered in Brisbane earlier this month for our latest Pathway to the Boardroom event, where we were joined by Craig Manson and Jo Willoughby . We returned to some of the ground covered at our recent events from a different angle, and further explored the risks facing directors, different board settings and the realities of the role. Seven themes stood out. The first few board roles take time The move into the boardroom is situational and can follow a career crossroads. A board opportunity presenting soon after leaving an executive role can be taken as a sign that the timing is right. It can also be driven by realising the demands of executive life no longer suit you and choosing to pivot your career into the boardroom. Getting your first few board roles can take a long time, and your decisions need to be made purposefully. You should be prepared for a long journey and ready to stay open and curious. Caution matters too when considering opportunities: risk profiles need to be aligned, and the unintended consequences of an opportunity need to be thought through. It is important to be in a position to sustain yourself financially while your portfolio builds. Is a not-for-profit a good way to start? One perspective is that not-for-profit boards are a poor starting point given they tend to carry higher risk profiles and can lack the resources to protect their directors. Advisory boards can be a better pathway, and you can contribute expertise without being responsible for big decisions. Another view is that a not-for-profit is the easiest way to begin. It gives you clarity on your own risk appetite, a good grounding in governance, and informs your view on building your portfolio. However, not-for-profit boards will not necessarily help you get your first commercial board role. Understanding your value proposition Be clear about where you can add value from a governance perspective and just as clear about where you cannot add value. Your value proposition changes over time, so revisit it regularly and keep a focused perspective on what you can credibly deliver. The same discipline applies to the board resume, which is different to an executive resume: short, sharp and specific, and not written through an executive leadership lens. Show how your core executive competencies translate into a board governance role and keep updating it as your value proposition evolves. Know the board before you join it Due diligence before joining a board means looking at past board minutes, reports, the organisation’s financials, and using informal networks to reference and gather information on the company. It also means meeting with past directors and the management team, and gathering intelligence from other people in the organisation. A listed environment is intense and subject to high scrutiny. Going through a listing can be taxing on executive teams, and as a director you spend substantial time on compliance. There are continuous disclosure requirements, and the stakeholder gaze is constant. Government boards are also high scrutiny with a lot of reporting, though the personal accountability differs. Your obligations as a director don’t change, it is just a different cadence in a listed environment. In private organisations, you get slightly closer to the organisation with more hands-on involvement than in listed environments. Founder-led organisations are different again. No two founders are the same, and you need to be clear on your own risk appetite, as you are taking on legal risk as well as personal and professional risk. It is important to understand upfront the founders’ motivations and alignment to the business, as once a founder takes money from investors it is no longer solely their business. Go in with your eyes open and be prepared for what comes next. Whatever the organisation, you need to enjoy what you are doing and understand whether you and the organisation can deliver the expected outcomes, and the investment case you will be held accountable for. Being able to ask the right questions is key There is constant change with emerging technology and AI, and boards need to think about how to engage with the different technology skillsets. You are expected to know about AI, data, and how to protect an organisation against cyber threats, so being an educated generalist on these matters who knows enough to ask the right questions is key. That means continuing to upskill for as long as you are on a board. Boards also need transformation and change capability, which comes from directors who have run organisations, can work through ambiguity and change cycles, know their customers and can bring the customer voice to the boardroom. Directors must be able to read and interrogate financial statements to ask the right questions. Behavioural skills are harder to assess. Humility and integrity are important, as is the ability to build connection with other directors: being collegial, open-minded and emotionally intelligent. Good directors have firm opinions but are open to feedback and ultimately changing their opinion. The dynamic and effectiveness of the board are crucial, and the culture around a board table must be right. An effective Chair is crucial to a board’s success The relationship between the Chair and the Chief Executive Officer is critical. A Chair who understands what it is like to be a Chief Executive Officer can make a great mentor. A good Chair is curious, is motivated by wanting to build a great team, and is a unifier and driver who asks the right questions. How a Chair manages differences of opinion and robust conversations is critical to the success of the board. A good Chair is always a step ahead when it comes to succession planning. It should always be top of mind, because thinking about where the next generation of leaders will come from matters for the sustainability of the organisation. The job is always on You are always on call, and you never know what will come up next. You have to be accessible and prepared to be available whenever you are needed, and the mental load is real. You’re not in it for the money; you do it for the love of the work. For those who enjoy strategy and working with organisations to help them make better decisions, it can be very rewarding. _________________________________________________________________________ The conversation on what it means to be board ready continues, and Brisbane added the question of fit: which type of board setting suits the risk a director is willing to carry, and what the role will ask of them once they are on it. Our thanks to Michelle Gardiner , Managing Partner – Board practice at Derwent, for hosting the morning, and to Jo and Craig for sharing their experience with such practicality and honesty. Continue the conversation For further insights or to explore how Derwent can support your organisation's approach to board composition and succession, connect with our team at brisbane@derwentsearch.com.au . To register your interest in future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au .
By Michelle Gardiner • October 12, 2026
Senior executives gathered in Sydney last month for our Pathway to the Boardroom event, a programme now in its second decade of helping executives become board ready. We were privileged to be joined by Jacqueline Chow and Sylvia Wiggins who discussed what the transition from executive life to the boardroom actually involves and what it demands once you're there. Six themes stood out. The path looks different for everyone. The journey to becoming a Non Executive Director is individual and varied. For some, it starts with the realisation that they can create more impact in the boardroom than as an executive leader. Often this comes with a preference for the breadth of a board role, over the narrower focus of life as an executive. For others, it follows an event that prompts a deliberate rethink of their career. Not every board is going to be right for you. One thing some directors wish they had known at the beginning of their journey is that not every board is the right fit for you personally. The pathway involves a lot of rejection, and it takes maturity to reflect on what you have to offer as well as personal interest. Boards appoint based on what the organisation needs, so a rejection reflects a decision made in the board's interest rather than a judgement on the individual. It's also important to do due diligence on boards before joining. Non negotiables for joining a board include hygiene issues such as financials and legal but testing the people and culture of a board is imperative, this includes checking who among your own network has already worked with people on that board. Board culture reflects both an ability to vigorously debate ideas and a commitment to board solidarity to make a collective decision. A successful board is comfortable with both. The skillset is different. Skills that serve well in an executive career don't automatically transfer to the boardroom. Early on, a new director may be eager and want to ask lots of questions, but in a boardroom, what adds the most value is listening and adding a considered perspective. At a board meeting some of the most impactful directors can often sit quietly for most of a board meeting and make one well-judged contribution that makes a pivotal difference to the decisions made. The mindset shift matters too, in the executive world, a role carries responsibility for a function, but board directors are accountable for the whole organisation, which includes identifying contradictions, such as a growth target that conflicts with the risk appetite. Board composition expectations are shifting. The skills matrix is evolving. Finance, legal, governance and industry expertise remain core, but emerging skills such as cyber, work health and safety, and AI, once viewed as a specialty sitting with one expert board member, are now shifting to an expectation that all board members must understand. Directors need to be diligent about upskilling, particularly in AI, which is changing how organisations do business. Behavioural attributes matter just as much as technical capability: relentless curiosity to understand what is happening in the organisation, the confidence to change your mind and be challenged in your thinking, and a collaborative style comfortable with viewing the board as a collective that gains from the diversity of everyone in the room. Succession planning must be continuous. Boards need to discuss succession planning continuously to ensure it is orderly and timely, whether in response to volatility in the world, or externalities that require a transformational pivot. This includes carefully considering the timing of bringing on a new director. Chief Executive Officer succession is a particular challenge, requiring a balance between people feeling safe in their roles and the reality that a CEO who is well regarded today may not continue to be the right person for the organisation in a fast changing environment. The importance of building strong relationships can't be underestimated Trust is the foundation of a well-functioning board. In a crisis, directors rely on colleagues who will commit time and energy to resolving the problem as a team, and who can be counted on to ask the hard questions. That confidence has to be built well before it is needed. Because board members typically meet once a month or less often, relationships need deliberate attention, such as volunteering for a committee together, suggesting a webinar or inviting a fellow director for a coffee. _________________________________________________________________________ Our thanks to Michelle Gardiner , Managing Partner at Derwent, for hosting the morning, and to Jacqueline and Sylvia for such generous, practical insight into the realities of board life. Continue the conversation For further insights or to explore how Derwent can support your organisation's approach to board composition and succession, connect with our team at sydney@derwentsearch.com.au . To register your interest in future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au .
More Posts