News


The Evolving Australian Boardroom Landscape: Navigating Complexity in 2025

Michelle Gardiner • October 1, 2025


Australian boardrooms are confronting an unprecedented convergence of regulatory complexity, technological disruption, and stakeholder scrutiny. With mandatory climate reporting, rising cybersecurity threats, and AI disruption accelerating across industries, boards are making decisive talent moves to reposition their organisations. The focus is shifting from traditional oversight to strategic, innovative leadership in an increasingly complex environment. Moving from shareholder-only management to multi-stakeholder governance has become central to these strategies.


Critical Talent Trends

  • Artificial Intelligence: The New Governance Frontier – AI has emerged as perhaps the most significant governance challenge facing Australian boards with immediate implications. Board members need to ask two fundamental questions: What can AI do for our organisation? What risks does AI bring? Yet many Australian boards remain unprepared for voluntary AI reporting recommendations, opting to wait for potential mandatory frameworks in the future. This represents a fundamental shift from traditional technology oversight, now requiring directors capable of navigating complex AI implementation, risk assessment, and strategic deployment across business operations.
  • Cybersecurity: Critical Board Responsibility – the cybersecurity landscape presents stark challenges that demand board-level attention, with Australian data revealing the magnitude of this threat: cybercrime reports reached over 87,400 in FY24, with incidents logged every six minutes. We're witnessing emerging directors with strong commercial experience and contemporary cyber skills securing board positions ahead of more experienced candidates who lack these specialised capabilities. This pattern suggests a growing recognition of cyber expertise as increasingly valuable in boardroom composition, reflecting the evolving threat environment and the rising importance placed on directors who possess relevant digital risk management capabilities.
  • Climate Governance: From Aspiration to Action – climate governance has fundamentally shifted with the AICD's analysis showing that Australian boards are moving from aspiration and ambition to action, but progress is uneven. The regulatory framework is now concrete, with the introduction of mandatory climate reporting under globally-aligned standards representing a major milestone and requiring boards to increase oversight of climate risk, transition strategy, and scenario analysis. This transition demands directors who understand both the technical aspects of climate reporting and the strategic implications of sustainability transformation across business models.
  • Board Diversity: Progress and Challenges – substantial progress has been made in gender diversity, with women representing nearly half of board appointments to ASX 300 boards over the last two years and holding 35% of ASX board positions overall. However, broader diversity challenges remain significant. There is still work to be done with 91% of ASX 300 Directors having an Anglo-Celtic background and only six openly LGBQTIA+ ASX directors. Consensus is forming around the AICD's and 30% Club's objective of securing 40/40/20 (40% men/40% women/20% of any gender) representation, but investors are applying pressure to see broader ethnic diversity that will better reflect businesses' customer bases and operational footprint.
  • Shareholder Pressure – the shareholder activism landscape has intensified significantly, with Qantas’ shareholders rejecting the company's remuneration plan with a near-record 82.9% opposition following corporate scandals, demonstrating how reputation directly impacts board accountability. This escalating scrutiny requires directors who can navigate complex stakeholder relationships while maintaining strategic focus and delivering sustainable performance outcomes.
  • Corporate Culture Accountability – corporate culture accountability has transformed from aspiration to a regulatory requirement. The events at Qantas, Mineral Resources, WiseTech and Nine Entertainment demonstrate that investors will hold boards accountable for cultural failures. Industry Super Funds have pioneered this change, with Aware Super requiring its fifty largest investments to answer eleven questions focusing specifically on conduct risk. This reflects broader stakeholder scrutiny, with over 10% of ASX 300 businesses receiving votes against their remuneration reports last year – the largest proportion since legislation was introduced.

What This Means For…

  • Aspiring Directors: the pathway to the boardroom now requires contemporary technical competencies in AI, digital transformation, data analytics and cybersecurity oversight, supported by broader commercial skillsets and growth strategy experience. Traditional industry expertise alone is no longer sufficient – directors must demonstrate they can translate technical knowledge into boardroom value and strategic decision-making.
  • Current Board Members: existing directors face pressure to upskill in emerging technologies and stakeholder engagement while maintaining their core governance responsibilities. The evidence from the most recent AGM season clearly indicates that successful Australian boardrooms have evolved beyond traditional shareholder management to recognise that engagement across diverse groups – investors, employees, customers, regulators, and communities – drives superior long-term corporate performance.
  • Board Chairs and Nomination Committees: director recruitment strategies must balance immediate technical needs with longer-term strategic capabilities. Success is measured not by avoiding dissent, but by demonstrating authentic responsiveness to legitimate investor concerns whilst delivering sustainable organisational performance, requiring new assessment frameworks for director evaluation and selection.

The New Director Reality: Mindset, Skill Set and Tool Kit

 

Our Board practice specialises in two critical areas of the evolving governance landscape: creating pathways for executives to participate on boards alongside their executive careers, and appointing proven NEDs with the new and different capabilities today's organisations demand. 


We focus on three key attributes:

  • Mindset: strategic agility, customer-centricity, and the ability to challenge management constructively while supporting bold decision-making.
  • Skill Set: contemporary technical competencies in AI, digital transformation, data analytics and cybersecurity oversight must be supported by a broader commercial skillset and growth strategy in order to translate into boardroom value.
  • Tool Kit: practical frameworks for technology oversight, digital risk management, and driving innovation at the governance level.

How Our Board Practice Can Help

 

We look forward to partnering with you to ensure your board composition is positioned for future success. Whether you're looking to create pathways for executives to enter the boardroom, appoint directors with the new skill sets and mindsets needed for modern challenges, or develop governance strategies positioned for regulatory compliance and stakeholder expectations.


Contact Us or connect directly with Michelle Gardiner, Julie Colvin, Mike O'Sullivan, Ben Derwent or Lindsay Every.

Share this Article

Recent Articles

By Michelle Gardiner • November 11, 2026
A board only sees what management chooses to show it, and part of the job is knowing when that picture is incomplete. Senior executives gathered in Perth last month for our Pathway to the Boardroom event, where we were joined by John Klepec and Caroline Chan , experienced board directors within the resources, mining, financial services, agribusiness and property industries, on ASX-listed and privately held boards. We revisited some of the ground covered at our recent events, with a closer look at how boards deal with management and why boards should lead on AI. Six key themes stood out. The pathway is not linear Board roles tend to come through your network and being recommended; however, opportunities are few and far between. It is important to be mindful of the board roles you pursue, as conflicts, time commitments and market positioning could prevent you from getting other board roles in the future, but you may need to accept some trade-offs initially. As an aspiring director it is important to set expectations on where you sit in the market, look in the mirror and think about what you are suited for. The transition to board can be quite difficult and it requires a mindset shift. Boards appoint on more than your CV A board is a team sport. You are bound by the collective decision of the board. It is important to have dissenting views on a board, but at the end of the day you have to be as one. Your value proposition is an evolution, and articulating it takes time. The skills on your CV and the industries and roles you have worked in help to form the basis, but those are not necessarily what boards appoint you for. What becomes important is how others assess and take a view on how you might behave in the boardroom when exercising your skills and judgements constructively. Culture shapes performance. Skilled, low-ego directors can be very effective, while a room full of combative personalities is dysfunctional. Start your due diligence with the Chair The most important conversation is with the Chair, and finding out who else you know on the board. The Chair sets the tone, and the way the Chair handles challenges is an important signal of board culture. Decisions bind you collectively and it is very difficult to remove someone from a board, so thorough due diligence is key. Look at how people behave under pressure, because even after due diligence you don’t really know until you work with them. What suits you depends on what you want to get out of it Each type of board asks something different. In a government board there is more emphasis on compliance, public accountability and policy expectations. In a private organisation, shareholder’s objectives shape the agenda. Private boards can be very good, as the individual makes decisions quickly and the discussion is between the shareholder and the board. Not-for-profit boards for commercial people can sometimes be challenging in terms of dynamics and board function, as it can be hard to get agreement on things. ASX-listed boards also operate within market disclosure and investor expectations. Advisory boards can involve broader discussions, giving input from your sector and expertise. For aspiring directors, the question is where your contribution fits, not which board type ranks highest. Ask the right questions, and challenge what management presents In an executive career, you have all the context for the ultimate decision. On a board, you receive a paper with the conclusion but not the full context. Practise suspending judgement, get curious and ask the right questions. One approach is to read each paper and work out the “so what” and the “then what”. Ask what alternatives were considered, which assumptions matter most and what would change the recommendation. Another approach is that a Chair could debrief with the Chief Executive Officer at the end of each meeting on what worked well, which conversations were clear, and which papers did not have a purpose. A board cannot be a team of yes people. Management becomes skilled at stage managing a board, so keep your eyes wide open and call out what doesn’t stack up. That challenge often comes from an industry expert on the board or from outside the company. A board should be governing for where the business is going, not just checking lagging indicators and results. That means holding management to account. It also means contributing to strategy, agreeing risk appetite and tracking forward-looking indicators, while leaving day-to-day execution with management. Directors do not need to be AI experts, but boards need to push the AI agenda The skills that are starting to emerge in the boardroom vary: digital fluency, continuous learning, suspending judgement, curiosity, being open minded and adaptable. On AI specifically, you do not need to be an expert. One approach is to take an AI course to get a better sense of the potential impact, so you can ask better questions in the boardroom and know which experts you need. Boards need to push the AI agenda with management. AI can challenge established roles and business models: it can augment work, improve services and create new value, as well as automate tasks and change workforce needs. Boards should ask where AI is already being used, what value is expected, who is accountable and how results will be tested. They should also seek assurance on data privacy, security, reliability and human oversight, and ask how employees and customers will be affected. Management should develop and execute the response within the board’s agreed strategy and risk appetite. _________________________________________________________________________ Our thanks to Michelle Gardiner , Managing Partner – Board practice at Derwent, for hosting the morning, and to John and Caroline for sharing their experience so openly. A special thanks to Julie Colvin , Managing Partner – Perth, and our Perth team for their support in bringing this event to life. Continue the conversation For further insights or to explore how Derwent can support your organisation's approach to board composition, connect with our team at perth@derwentsearch.com.au . To register your interest in future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au .
By Michelle Gardiner • October 26, 2026
A board career is a fantastic one for those who love strategy and working across a range of sectors and settings, but the mental load shouldn’t be underestimated. Senior executives gathered in Brisbane earlier this month for our latest Pathway to the Boardroom event, where we were joined by Craig Manson and Jo Willoughby . We returned to some of the ground covered at our recent events from a different angle, and further explored the risks facing directors, different board settings and the realities of the role. Seven themes stood out. The first few board roles take time The move into the boardroom is situational and can follow a career crossroads. A board opportunity presenting soon after leaving an executive role can be taken as a sign that the timing is right. It can also be driven by realising the demands of executive life no longer suit you and choosing to pivot your career into the boardroom. Getting your first few board roles can take a long time, and your decisions need to be made purposefully. You should be prepared for a long journey and ready to stay open and curious. Caution matters too when considering opportunities: risk profiles need to be aligned, and the unintended consequences of an opportunity need to be thought through. It is important to be in a position to sustain yourself financially while your portfolio builds. Is a not-for-profit a good way to start? One perspective is that not-for-profit boards are a poor starting point given they tend to carry higher risk profiles and can lack the resources to protect their directors. Advisory boards can be a better pathway, and you can contribute expertise without being responsible for big decisions. Another view is that a not-for-profit is the easiest way to begin. It gives you clarity on your own risk appetite, a good grounding in governance, and informs your view on building your portfolio. However, not-for-profit boards will not necessarily help you get your first commercial board role. Understanding your value proposition Be clear about where you can add value from a governance perspective and just as clear about where you cannot add value. Your value proposition changes over time, so revisit it regularly and keep a focused perspective on what you can credibly deliver. The same discipline applies to the board resume, which is different to an executive resume: short, sharp and specific, and not written through an executive leadership lens. Show how your core executive competencies translate into a board governance role and keep updating it as your value proposition evolves. Know the board before you join it Due diligence before joining a board means looking at past board minutes, reports, the organisation’s financials, and using informal networks to reference and gather information on the company. It also means meeting with past directors and the management team, and gathering intelligence from other people in the organisation. A listed environment is intense and subject to high scrutiny. Going through a listing can be taxing on executive teams, and as a director you spend substantial time on compliance. There are continuous disclosure requirements, and the stakeholder gaze is constant. Government boards are also high scrutiny with a lot of reporting, though the personal accountability differs. Your obligations as a director don’t change, it is just a different cadence in a listed environment. In private organisations, you get slightly closer to the organisation with more hands-on involvement than in listed environments. Founder-led organisations are different again. No two founders are the same, and you need to be clear on your own risk appetite, as you are taking on legal risk as well as personal and professional risk. It is important to understand upfront the founders’ motivations and alignment to the business, as once a founder takes money from investors it is no longer solely their business. Go in with your eyes open and be prepared for what comes next. Whatever the organisation, you need to enjoy what you are doing and understand whether you and the organisation can deliver the expected outcomes, and the investment case you will be held accountable for. Being able to ask the right questions is key There is constant change with emerging technology and AI, and boards need to think about how to engage with the different technology skillsets. You are expected to know about AI, data, and how to protect an organisation against cyber threats, so being an educated generalist on these matters who knows enough to ask the right questions is key. That means continuing to upskill for as long as you are on a board. Boards also need transformation and change capability, which comes from directors who have run organisations, can work through ambiguity and change cycles, know their customers and can bring the customer voice to the boardroom. Directors must be able to read and interrogate financial statements to ask the right questions. Behavioural skills are harder to assess. Humility and integrity are important, as is the ability to build connection with other directors: being collegial, open-minded and emotionally intelligent. Good directors have firm opinions but are open to feedback and ultimately changing their opinion. The dynamic and effectiveness of the board are crucial, and the culture around a board table must be right. An effective Chair is crucial to a board’s success The relationship between the Chair and the Chief Executive Officer is critical. A Chair who understands what it is like to be a Chief Executive Officer can make a great mentor. A good Chair is curious, is motivated by wanting to build a great team, and is a unifier and driver who asks the right questions. How a Chair manages differences of opinion and robust conversations is critical to the success of the board. A good Chair is always a step ahead when it comes to succession planning. It should always be top of mind, because thinking about where the next generation of leaders will come from matters for the sustainability of the organisation. The job is always on You are always on call, and you never know what will come up next. You have to be accessible and prepared to be available whenever you are needed, and the mental load is real. You’re not in it for the money; you do it for the love of the work. For those who enjoy strategy and working with organisations to help them make better decisions, it can be very rewarding. _________________________________________________________________________ The conversation on what it means to be board ready continues, and Brisbane added the question of fit: which type of board setting suits the risk a director is willing to carry, and what the role will ask of them once they are on it. Our thanks to Michelle Gardiner , Managing Partner – Board practice at Derwent, for hosting the morning, and to Jo and Craig for sharing their experience with such practicality and honesty. Continue the conversation For further insights or to explore how Derwent can support your organisation's approach to board composition and succession, connect with our team at brisbane@derwentsearch.com.au . To register your interest in future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au .
By Michelle Gardiner • October 12, 2026
Senior executives gathered in Sydney last month for our Pathway to the Boardroom event, a programme now in its second decade of helping executives become board ready. We were privileged to be joined by Jacqueline Chow and Sylvia Wiggins who discussed what the transition from executive life to the boardroom actually involves and what it demands once you're there. Six themes stood out. The path looks different for everyone. The journey to becoming a Non Executive Director is individual and varied. For some, it starts with the realisation that they can create more impact in the boardroom than as an executive leader. Often this comes with a preference for the breadth of a board role, over the narrower focus of life as an executive. For others, it follows an event that prompts a deliberate rethink of their career. Not every board is going to be right for you. One thing some directors wish they had known at the beginning of their journey is that not every board is the right fit for you personally. The pathway involves a lot of rejection, and it takes maturity to reflect on what you have to offer as well as personal interest. Boards appoint based on what the organisation needs, so a rejection reflects a decision made in the board's interest rather than a judgement on the individual. It's also important to do due diligence on boards before joining. Non negotiables for joining a board include hygiene issues such as financials and legal but testing the people and culture of a board is imperative, this includes checking who among your own network has already worked with people on that board. Board culture reflects both an ability to vigorously debate ideas and a commitment to board solidarity to make a collective decision. A successful board is comfortable with both. The skillset is different. Skills that serve well in an executive career don't automatically transfer to the boardroom. Early on, a new director may be eager and want to ask lots of questions, but in a boardroom, what adds the most value is listening and adding a considered perspective. At a board meeting some of the most impactful directors can often sit quietly for most of a board meeting and make one well-judged contribution that makes a pivotal difference to the decisions made. The mindset shift matters too, in the executive world, a role carries responsibility for a function, but board directors are accountable for the whole organisation, which includes identifying contradictions, such as a growth target that conflicts with the risk appetite. Board composition expectations are shifting. The skills matrix is evolving. Finance, legal, governance and industry expertise remain core, but emerging skills such as cyber, work health and safety, and AI, once viewed as a specialty sitting with one expert board member, are now shifting to an expectation that all board members must understand. Directors need to be diligent about upskilling, particularly in AI, which is changing how organisations do business. Behavioural attributes matter just as much as technical capability: relentless curiosity to understand what is happening in the organisation, the confidence to change your mind and be challenged in your thinking, and a collaborative style comfortable with viewing the board as a collective that gains from the diversity of everyone in the room. Succession planning must be continuous. Boards need to discuss succession planning continuously to ensure it is orderly and timely, whether in response to volatility in the world, or externalities that require a transformational pivot. This includes carefully considering the timing of bringing on a new director. Chief Executive Officer succession is a particular challenge, requiring a balance between people feeling safe in their roles and the reality that a CEO who is well regarded today may not continue to be the right person for the organisation in a fast changing environment. The importance of building strong relationships can't be underestimated Trust is the foundation of a well-functioning board. In a crisis, directors rely on colleagues who will commit time and energy to resolving the problem as a team, and who can be counted on to ask the hard questions. That confidence has to be built well before it is needed. Because board members typically meet once a month or less often, relationships need deliberate attention, such as volunteering for a committee together, suggesting a webinar or inviting a fellow director for a coffee. _________________________________________________________________________ Our thanks to Michelle Gardiner , Managing Partner at Derwent, for hosting the morning, and to Jacqueline and Sylvia for such generous, practical insight into the realities of board life. Continue the conversation For further insights or to explore how Derwent can support your organisation's approach to board composition and succession, connect with our team at sydney@derwentsearch.com.au . To register your interest in future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au .
Show More
By Michelle Gardiner • November 11, 2026
A board only sees what management chooses to show it, and part of the job is knowing when that picture is incomplete. Senior executives gathered in Perth last month for our Pathway to the Boardroom event, where we were joined by John Klepec and Caroline Chan , experienced board directors within the resources, mining, financial services, agribusiness and property industries, on ASX-listed and privately held boards. We revisited some of the ground covered at our recent events, with a closer look at how boards deal with management and why boards should lead on AI. Six key themes stood out. The pathway is not linear Board roles tend to come through your network and being recommended; however, opportunities are few and far between. It is important to be mindful of the board roles you pursue, as conflicts, time commitments and market positioning could prevent you from getting other board roles in the future, but you may need to accept some trade-offs initially. As an aspiring director it is important to set expectations on where you sit in the market, look in the mirror and think about what you are suited for. The transition to board can be quite difficult and it requires a mindset shift. Boards appoint on more than your CV A board is a team sport. You are bound by the collective decision of the board. It is important to have dissenting views on a board, but at the end of the day you have to be as one. Your value proposition is an evolution, and articulating it takes time. The skills on your CV and the industries and roles you have worked in help to form the basis, but those are not necessarily what boards appoint you for. What becomes important is how others assess and take a view on how you might behave in the boardroom when exercising your skills and judgements constructively. Culture shapes performance. Skilled, low-ego directors can be very effective, while a room full of combative personalities is dysfunctional. Start your due diligence with the Chair The most important conversation is with the Chair, and finding out who else you know on the board. The Chair sets the tone, and the way the Chair handles challenges is an important signal of board culture. Decisions bind you collectively and it is very difficult to remove someone from a board, so thorough due diligence is key. Look at how people behave under pressure, because even after due diligence you don’t really know until you work with them. What suits you depends on what you want to get out of it Each type of board asks something different. In a government board there is more emphasis on compliance, public accountability and policy expectations. In a private organisation, shareholder’s objectives shape the agenda. Private boards can be very good, as the individual makes decisions quickly and the discussion is between the shareholder and the board. Not-for-profit boards for commercial people can sometimes be challenging in terms of dynamics and board function, as it can be hard to get agreement on things. ASX-listed boards also operate within market disclosure and investor expectations. Advisory boards can involve broader discussions, giving input from your sector and expertise. For aspiring directors, the question is where your contribution fits, not which board type ranks highest. Ask the right questions, and challenge what management presents In an executive career, you have all the context for the ultimate decision. On a board, you receive a paper with the conclusion but not the full context. Practise suspending judgement, get curious and ask the right questions. One approach is to read each paper and work out the “so what” and the “then what”. Ask what alternatives were considered, which assumptions matter most and what would change the recommendation. Another approach is that a Chair could debrief with the Chief Executive Officer at the end of each meeting on what worked well, which conversations were clear, and which papers did not have a purpose. A board cannot be a team of yes people. Management becomes skilled at stage managing a board, so keep your eyes wide open and call out what doesn’t stack up. That challenge often comes from an industry expert on the board or from outside the company. A board should be governing for where the business is going, not just checking lagging indicators and results. That means holding management to account. It also means contributing to strategy, agreeing risk appetite and tracking forward-looking indicators, while leaving day-to-day execution with management. Directors do not need to be AI experts, but boards need to push the AI agenda The skills that are starting to emerge in the boardroom vary: digital fluency, continuous learning, suspending judgement, curiosity, being open minded and adaptable. On AI specifically, you do not need to be an expert. One approach is to take an AI course to get a better sense of the potential impact, so you can ask better questions in the boardroom and know which experts you need. Boards need to push the AI agenda with management. AI can challenge established roles and business models: it can augment work, improve services and create new value, as well as automate tasks and change workforce needs. Boards should ask where AI is already being used, what value is expected, who is accountable and how results will be tested. They should also seek assurance on data privacy, security, reliability and human oversight, and ask how employees and customers will be affected. Management should develop and execute the response within the board’s agreed strategy and risk appetite. _________________________________________________________________________ Our thanks to Michelle Gardiner , Managing Partner – Board practice at Derwent, for hosting the morning, and to John and Caroline for sharing their experience so openly. A special thanks to Julie Colvin , Managing Partner – Perth, and our Perth team for their support in bringing this event to life. Continue the conversation For further insights or to explore how Derwent can support your organisation's approach to board composition, connect with our team at perth@derwentsearch.com.au . To register your interest in future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au .
By Michelle Gardiner • October 26, 2026
A board career is a fantastic one for those who love strategy and working across a range of sectors and settings, but the mental load shouldn’t be underestimated. Senior executives gathered in Brisbane earlier this month for our latest Pathway to the Boardroom event, where we were joined by Craig Manson and Jo Willoughby . We returned to some of the ground covered at our recent events from a different angle, and further explored the risks facing directors, different board settings and the realities of the role. Seven themes stood out. The first few board roles take time The move into the boardroom is situational and can follow a career crossroads. A board opportunity presenting soon after leaving an executive role can be taken as a sign that the timing is right. It can also be driven by realising the demands of executive life no longer suit you and choosing to pivot your career into the boardroom. Getting your first few board roles can take a long time, and your decisions need to be made purposefully. You should be prepared for a long journey and ready to stay open and curious. Caution matters too when considering opportunities: risk profiles need to be aligned, and the unintended consequences of an opportunity need to be thought through. It is important to be in a position to sustain yourself financially while your portfolio builds. Is a not-for-profit a good way to start? One perspective is that not-for-profit boards are a poor starting point given they tend to carry higher risk profiles and can lack the resources to protect their directors. Advisory boards can be a better pathway, and you can contribute expertise without being responsible for big decisions. Another view is that a not-for-profit is the easiest way to begin. It gives you clarity on your own risk appetite, a good grounding in governance, and informs your view on building your portfolio. However, not-for-profit boards will not necessarily help you get your first commercial board role. Understanding your value proposition Be clear about where you can add value from a governance perspective and just as clear about where you cannot add value. Your value proposition changes over time, so revisit it regularly and keep a focused perspective on what you can credibly deliver. The same discipline applies to the board resume, which is different to an executive resume: short, sharp and specific, and not written through an executive leadership lens. Show how your core executive competencies translate into a board governance role and keep updating it as your value proposition evolves. Know the board before you join it Due diligence before joining a board means looking at past board minutes, reports, the organisation’s financials, and using informal networks to reference and gather information on the company. It also means meeting with past directors and the management team, and gathering intelligence from other people in the organisation. A listed environment is intense and subject to high scrutiny. Going through a listing can be taxing on executive teams, and as a director you spend substantial time on compliance. There are continuous disclosure requirements, and the stakeholder gaze is constant. Government boards are also high scrutiny with a lot of reporting, though the personal accountability differs. Your obligations as a director don’t change, it is just a different cadence in a listed environment. In private organisations, you get slightly closer to the organisation with more hands-on involvement than in listed environments. Founder-led organisations are different again. No two founders are the same, and you need to be clear on your own risk appetite, as you are taking on legal risk as well as personal and professional risk. It is important to understand upfront the founders’ motivations and alignment to the business, as once a founder takes money from investors it is no longer solely their business. Go in with your eyes open and be prepared for what comes next. Whatever the organisation, you need to enjoy what you are doing and understand whether you and the organisation can deliver the expected outcomes, and the investment case you will be held accountable for. Being able to ask the right questions is key There is constant change with emerging technology and AI, and boards need to think about how to engage with the different technology skillsets. You are expected to know about AI, data, and how to protect an organisation against cyber threats, so being an educated generalist on these matters who knows enough to ask the right questions is key. That means continuing to upskill for as long as you are on a board. Boards also need transformation and change capability, which comes from directors who have run organisations, can work through ambiguity and change cycles, know their customers and can bring the customer voice to the boardroom. Directors must be able to read and interrogate financial statements to ask the right questions. Behavioural skills are harder to assess. Humility and integrity are important, as is the ability to build connection with other directors: being collegial, open-minded and emotionally intelligent. Good directors have firm opinions but are open to feedback and ultimately changing their opinion. The dynamic and effectiveness of the board are crucial, and the culture around a board table must be right. An effective Chair is crucial to a board’s success The relationship between the Chair and the Chief Executive Officer is critical. A Chair who understands what it is like to be a Chief Executive Officer can make a great mentor. A good Chair is curious, is motivated by wanting to build a great team, and is a unifier and driver who asks the right questions. How a Chair manages differences of opinion and robust conversations is critical to the success of the board. A good Chair is always a step ahead when it comes to succession planning. It should always be top of mind, because thinking about where the next generation of leaders will come from matters for the sustainability of the organisation. The job is always on You are always on call, and you never know what will come up next. You have to be accessible and prepared to be available whenever you are needed, and the mental load is real. You’re not in it for the money; you do it for the love of the work. For those who enjoy strategy and working with organisations to help them make better decisions, it can be very rewarding. _________________________________________________________________________ The conversation on what it means to be board ready continues, and Brisbane added the question of fit: which type of board setting suits the risk a director is willing to carry, and what the role will ask of them once they are on it. Our thanks to Michelle Gardiner , Managing Partner – Board practice at Derwent, for hosting the morning, and to Jo and Craig for sharing their experience with such practicality and honesty. Continue the conversation For further insights or to explore how Derwent can support your organisation's approach to board composition and succession, connect with our team at brisbane@derwentsearch.com.au . To register your interest in future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au .
More Posts