News


Accelerating Diversity; Spurring Growth For Australian Industrials

September 19, 2018

Just over half of the Australian population (50.7 per cent) is female; just under half of the employee population1 is female (47 per cent).

 

Yet in Australia’s industrial sector women currently hold just 10 per cent of the line roles and 30 per cent of the functional roles in executive leadership.

 

Analysis of the financial impact of more gender diverse and inclusive teams has shown time and again that gender balanced business teams outperform gender-skewed teams in terms of sales and profits2.

A landmark study of more than 2,000 global companies conducted by Credit Suisse has also shown that firms with one or more women on the board have delivered higher average returns on equity, lower gearing, better average growth and higher price/book value multiples over the course of a six-year period3.

For many Australian industrials, improving their record on gender diversity is a clear business goal. There are frustrations that the pipeline of female employees is still slender – women are less well represented in STEM (science, technology, engineering and maths) tertiary education than men – but there are still opportunities to lift the gender diversity of Australian enterprise.

 

As the industrial practice lead with Derwent Executive I work with Boards and CEOs seeking to fill senior executive roles. I’m always keen to field as many strong women candidates as possible. To work out how it might be possible to accelerate diversity in the sector I approached a number of women who have risen through the ranks to the top of their profession to ask them to share their insights.

 

Adelle Howse for example is the ex CFO for Lattice Energy and Deputy Chairman Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute. She acknowledges that the issue isn’t confined to the industrial sector – though she says it does face additional challenges.

 

“Males have traditionally been very dominant in the industrial sector – especially engineering, construction, energy, resources. This is historic but also relates to availability of skills. Statistically about 14-16 per cent of engineering graduates are female and this hasn’t changed much in the last ten years.”


As a result, there simply isn’t a large representation of experienced women rising through the ranks in the sector, she says, and for some managers that can dissuade them from looking for women candidates that may come through a less traditional career route.

 

As Mariela Millington, CIO of Brightstar APAC notes; “Natural bias occurs in that usually you hire in the image you think the role needs to have. Almost always that image is a reflection of yourself,” she says. Since men are often the ones doing the hiring, that can lead to men being hired rather than women.


Andrea Pidcock, Executive General Manager of CSR Lightweight Systems, says that the hiring bias is compounded because male leaders’ role models have been overwhelmingly male in the past. “It leads


1 https://www.humanrights.gov.au/education/face-facts/face-facts-gender-equality-2018

2 http://gap.hks.harvard.edu/impact-gender-diversity-performance-business-teams-evidence-field-experiment

3 https://www.calstrs.com/sites/main/files/file-

attachments/csri_gender_diversity_and_corporate_performance.pdf


them to an innate belief that women are less capable, less ambitious, not as tough and not suited to the industrial environment that they themselves thrive in.”

 

The successful careers that each of these women has carved out gives lie to that belief.


Adelle Howse in any case believes the attitude is changing, especially as a new generation of industrials leaders “recognise the benefits of a diversity of experience and provide coaching and development for particular skills sets needed in the leadership roles in the industry sector,” she says.

 

That approach accelerates the march toward more diverse workplaces and sets up enterprise and individuals for greater success.

 

“Start by recruiting and promoting females into leadership positions – immediately. These females already exist. It shows other females that there is the potential to get to the leadership position,” says Howse.

While there is a way to go, Lee De Winton, CEO of Sydney Metro Airports (Bankstown & Camden) says that it’s important to recognise that although it is taking longer than expected to achieve equal opportunity, there has been progress.

 

“We have come from environments where as recently as 30 years ago in some work streams women had to leave if they were getting married or when pregnant. We are transforming decades of traditional reasonably quickly.


“Is it good enough yet? No. Now it’s time to consider how we accelerate this into a more equitable balance or representation.”

 

No one that I spoke to liked the idea of imposing quotas on the sector – but aspirational targets are seen as a way to accelerate diversity action.

 

Jayne Whitney, Chief Strategy Officer, John Holland, Director and Deputy Chairman, ISCA (Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia) neatly sums up the group’s feelings. “Targets are a useful tool when the benchmark is so low – but quotas have a negative connotation.”


Many senior women leaders in the sector believe that aspirational targets will prove critically important for industrials which want to really shift the dial on diversity.


Adelle Howse says that company boards should set targets and hold executive leaders to account as to why those targets cannot be met.

 

Given the mounting evidence of the financial impact that gender diverse teams deliver – it is increasingly hard to argue against the move toward greater equality.


But while targets are useful, ultimately it will be cultures that win out says Shona Fitzgerald, Managing Director of CRC Industries. “Operate an organisation based on good values as this attracts the right people and then diversity isn’t something that needs to be focused on, because it’s a given from the integrity of the people that you attract,” she says.

 

The advice and insight from these women leaders who are already at the top of their game is invaluable for forward looking, growth focused organisations.


The rewards of gender diversity are clear. Yes, the pipeline of female candidates in the industrial sector may be slender, but the opportunity to identify talented women across the enterprise and offer them the training and mentorship that would benefit them and the business is one that should never be overlooked during the recruitment and promotion process.

 

Finally, thanks to all women who engaged with me and whose views I’ll share more broadly in this series, in particular thanks to;

 

• Adelle Howse – Principal, Structuring for Performance; Deputy Chairman Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute


• Andrea Pidcock - Executive General Manager, CSR Lightweight Systems


• Gabrielle Martinovich – Director, Definitude Consulting


• Jayne Whitney - Chief Strategy Officer, John Holland; Director & Deputy Chairman, ISCA (The Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia)


• Jennifer Purdie - Chief Executive Officer, Adani Australia Renewables


• Lee de Winton – CEO, Sydney Metro Airports (Bankstown & Camden)


• Mariela Millington - Chief Information Officer, Brightstar APAC


• Shona Fitzgerald - Managing Director, CRC Industries


I’m hoping to add more insights over the course of this series – so please do feel free to share your insights with me at HHall@derwentexecutive.com.au


Helen Hall is a Partner at Derwent Executive

 

About Derwent 

 

Derwent (www.derwentsearch) is an established leader in Executive Search, Board Appointments and Talent Advisory. We specialise in senior executive appointments in private and listed mid-market organisations and the public sector.


With over twenty years of expertise across a range of industries and a strong regional presence, we are ideally positioned to provide high calibre talent and effective strategic guidance to help our clients build strong, dynamic and sustainable organisations.

 

Helen Hall, Partner - Sydney

 

Helen is the Partner lead in the Industrial Practice at Derwent where she has a wide breadth of exposure to executive role types from Boards, CEOs and the C-Suite. She is a passionate advocate for driving diversity, in all its complexity, into the Australian industrial sector and a strong proponent of harnessing the power of digital leadership through the sector. Prior to joining Derwent Helen spent more than 20 years in businesses working across Australia, New Zealand and Asia Pacific. 

 

She holds a Master of Marketing from Macquarie Graduate School of Management and a Bachelor of Business from Charles Sturt University.

 

For more information please contact:

 

Helen Hall + 61 2 90913283

 

Katelyn Ranpaia + 61 2 90913206

Share this Article

Recent Articles

By Michelle Gardiner October 14, 2025
Senior executives navigating the transition from executive to Non-Executive Director roles face a pathway that's less organic and more deliberate than many expect. Derwent delved into this important topic with 50 senior executives in Brisbane last week at our Pathway to the Boardroom event. Despite different journeys throughout their executive careers and into a Board portfolio, our speakers, Susan Forrester AM and Teresa Dyson , shared their wisdom across the decisions that support your transition to Director, the importance of leveraging networks across your career, value addition and the shift from an operating mindset, and the importance of thorough due diligence. Key Themes & Takeaways Pathway from executive to non-executive The pathway is not easy during transition from an executive career. You need to be “eyes wide open and have a thick skin” – there will be individual and market circumstances that will test your resolve and motivations. A deliberate and formal transition to a Board career can make the path clearer – especially for the networks that are trying to advocate for your Board candidacy. Many individuals expect that they will organically end up on boards after their executive career; however, in reality it’s a long process that requires patience, intent, and effort. The power of your network Leverage your network of experience and draw on different periods of your career journey for introductions and conversations that might lead to Board opportunities. Map out a plan of who you should be talking to, including existing Board members, other well-networked senior executives, Board communities (such as AICD), and relevant experts such as Board search partners. By letting broad networks know of your intention and desire to join Boards, it can provide opportunities to get a foot in the door. Get out there and plant a lot of different seeds! The importance of your value-add proposition Many aspiring Board Directors can tick a lot of the boxes when it comes to the criteria for Board candidacy, but the difference can be the fit to specific organisations. Your value addition can be identified across various facets, including your functional or industry expertise, your broader career achievement or success (such as major transactions, industry changes, working in different settings or ownership structures, etc), and personal or ethical alignment. Part of developing your individual proposition is sharing the unique elements of your profile with your networks, including the personal experiences and drivers that can be as important as your professional experience. Director mindset versus executive mindset New Directors often try to prove their executive and sometimes technical expertise, and need to make the shift to a mindset of governing over managing – “noses in and fingers out”. There’s a style of thinking from an executive career that allows you to draw on your experience and add real value to a Board setting. A change in mindset is required in order to add value in the critical areas for a Board member, such as setting and agreeing strategy alongside management, managing risk, and selecting the CEO. Conducting due diligence as you explore Board opportunities Due diligence is mutual – both for companies bringing on a Board member, and Board members looking to join an organisation. Exploration may include reading previous annual reports, talking to brokers or customers, and most importantly meeting the Chair, committee members, and other Directors if possible. Each Board has its own risk appetite, so it’s important to understand the values and risk alignment. Building relationships with other Board members to have open and honest conversations can take time and trust. “Boards are like a team – they don’t train together often, but they come together to play”. Our thanks to Michelle Gardiner , Managing Partner from our Board practice, for hosting this event, and to our guest speakers and attendees for their valuable contributions. Continue the conversation We'd love to hear your perspective on this topic! For further insights or to explore how Derwent can help you or your organisation, connect with our team at brisbane@derwentsearch.com.au . To express your interest for future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au .
By Michelle Gardiner October 1, 2025
Australian boardrooms are confronting an unprecedented convergence of regulatory complexity, technological disruption, and stakeholder scrutiny. With mandatory climate reporting, rising cybersecurity threats, and AI disruption accelerating across industries, boards are making decisive talent moves to reposition their organisations. The focus is shifting from traditional oversight to strategic, innovative leadership in an increasingly complex environment. Moving from shareholder-only management to multi-stakeholder governance has become central to these strategies. Critical Talent Trends Artificial Intelligence: The New Governance Frontier – AI has emerged as perhaps the most significant governance challenge facing Australian boards with immediate implications. Board members need to ask two fundamental questions: What can AI do for our organisation? What risks does AI bring? Yet many Australian boards remain unprepared for voluntary AI reporting recommendations, opting to wait for potential mandatory frameworks in the future. This represents a fundamental shift from traditional technology oversight, now requiring directors capable of navigating complex AI implementation, risk assessment, and strategic deployment across business operations. Cybersecurity: Critical Board Responsibility – the cybersecurity landscape presents stark challenges that demand board-level attention, with Australian data revealing the magnitude of this threat: cybercrime reports reached over 87,400 in FY24, with incidents logged every six minutes. We're witnessing emerging directors with strong commercial experience and contemporary cyber skills securing board positions ahead of more experienced candidates who lack these specialised capabilities. This pattern suggests a growing recognition of cyber expertise as increasingly valuable in boardroom composition, reflecting the evolving threat environment and the rising importance placed on directors who possess relevant digital risk management capabilities . Climate Governance: From Aspiration to Action – climate governance has fundamentally shifted with the AICD's analysis showing that Australian boards are moving from aspiration and ambition to action, but progress is uneven. The regulatory framework is now concrete, with the introduction of mandatory climate reporting under globally-aligned standards representing a major milestone and requiring boards to increase oversight of climate risk, transition strategy, and scenario analysis. This transition demands directors who understand both the technical aspects of climate reporting and the strategic implications of sustainability transformation across business models. Board Diversity: Progress and Challenges – substantial progress has been made in gender diversity, with women representing nearly half of board appointments to ASX 300 boards over the last two years and holding 35% of ASX board positions overall. However, broader diversity challenges remain significant. There is still work to be done with 91% of ASX 300 Directors having an Anglo-Celtic background and only six openly LGBQTIA+ ASX directors. Consensus is forming around the AICD's and 30% Club's objective of securing 40/40/20 (40% men/40% women/20% of any gender) representation, but investors are applying pressure to see broader ethnic diversity that will better reflect businesses' customer bases and operational footprint. Shareholder Pressure – the shareholder activism landscape has intensified significantly, with Qantas’ shareholders rejecting the company's remuneration plan with a near-record 82.9% opposition following corporate scandals, demonstrating how reputation directly impacts board accountability. This escalating scrutiny requires directors who can navigate complex stakeholder relationships while maintaining strategic focus and delivering sustainable performance outcomes. Corporate Culture Accountability – corporate culture accountability has transformed from aspiration to a regulatory requirement. The events at Qantas, Mineral Resources, WiseTech and Nine Entertainment demonstrate that investors will hold boards accountable for cultural failures. Industry Super Funds have pioneered this change, with Aware Super requiring its fifty largest investments to answer eleven questions focusing specifically on conduct risk. This reflects broader stakeholder scrutiny, with over 10% of ASX 300 businesses receiving votes against their remuneration reports last year – the largest proportion since legislation was introduced.
By Lindsay Every September 23, 2025
With AI transformation being a key focus for organisations, maximising the opportunities lies in understanding the leadership requirements and the approach to people engagement. Derwent explored this critical topic with senior executives in Sydney last week at our AI and The People breakfast event, examining three areas shaping the future: How people functions can support AI transformation. How AI is reshaping people management and operations. How leadership and team recruitment criteria are evolving in an AI world. The panel discussion delivered practical insights on how leading organisations are navigating AI workforce transformation, including the real changes, challenges, and opportunities they're experiencing. We heard from Peter Tonagh , Chairman at Quantium, and Catherine Walsh , Group Chief People Officer at Qantas, who shared their perspectives on leading AI transformation we’re still learning to understand ourselves. Highlighting that as leaders we cannot wait for certainty, or we will remain behind. We must adapt to lead through more ambiguity than we have faced before. Key Themes & Takeaways The Leadership Imperative : AI represents a fundamental leadership moment defining competitive advantage, with success being 80% about people and 20% about technology. Discussion emphasised leaders must reimagine value creation, shift from the "department of no" to AI-enablers, and take a holistic approach addressing mindset, skillset, and toolset together. Leaders must become 'Chief Excitement Officers' providing permission with guardrails while managing cognitive load impacts within their organisations, recognising that employees will use AI regardless of policy and that organisations not offering AI tools will lose talent. Strategic Implementation and Human-AI Partnership : The conversation outlined starting everything with AI as the default approach, focusing on capability over tools and customer benefit through clear use cases as competitive necessity. Successful implementation augments human judgement with AI enhancing HR practices including performance management and coaching with examples of enhanced performance reviews and recruitment outcomes. Leaders must become conductors of human-AI teams through effective engagement, setting direction and making judgement calls while ensuring AI amplifies capabilities, maintaining oversight while AI tools help leaders become better coaches, and addressing bias as a user problem requiring active correction. Future Talent Strategy and Trust Evolution : Critical attributes for AI-ready talent emerged as curiosity, critical thinking, persistence, agility, and optimism, challenging myths about graduates who are actually more AI-attuned than before. The conversation addressed balancing innovation with care, building trust through transparency, and ensuring continuous evolution while maintaining human connection as irreplaceable. Discussion emphasised continuous tool evolution requiring adaptable capabilities, documenting and sharing learnings, and ensuring people develop judgment to question AI appropriately. These insights underscore the critical need for Australian business leaders to embrace AI strategically while overcoming conservative risk tolerance. The conversation provided a comprehensive roadmap for organisations navigating AI transformation, from immediate implementation challenges to longer-term competitive advantages that will define future success. Our thanks to Lindsay Every , Group Managing Partner at Derwent for hosting this panel discussion, and to our guest speakers and attendees for their valuable contributions. Continue the conversation We'd love to hear your perspective on this topic! For further insights or to explore how Derwent can help you or your organisation, connect with our team at sydney@derwentsearch.com.au . To express your interest for future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au
Show More
By Michelle Gardiner October 14, 2025
Senior executives navigating the transition from executive to Non-Executive Director roles face a pathway that's less organic and more deliberate than many expect. Derwent delved into this important topic with 50 senior executives in Brisbane last week at our Pathway to the Boardroom event. Despite different journeys throughout their executive careers and into a Board portfolio, our speakers, Susan Forrester AM and Teresa Dyson , shared their wisdom across the decisions that support your transition to Director, the importance of leveraging networks across your career, value addition and the shift from an operating mindset, and the importance of thorough due diligence. Key Themes & Takeaways Pathway from executive to non-executive The pathway is not easy during transition from an executive career. You need to be “eyes wide open and have a thick skin” – there will be individual and market circumstances that will test your resolve and motivations. A deliberate and formal transition to a Board career can make the path clearer – especially for the networks that are trying to advocate for your Board candidacy. Many individuals expect that they will organically end up on boards after their executive career; however, in reality it’s a long process that requires patience, intent, and effort. The power of your network Leverage your network of experience and draw on different periods of your career journey for introductions and conversations that might lead to Board opportunities. Map out a plan of who you should be talking to, including existing Board members, other well-networked senior executives, Board communities (such as AICD), and relevant experts such as Board search partners. By letting broad networks know of your intention and desire to join Boards, it can provide opportunities to get a foot in the door. Get out there and plant a lot of different seeds! The importance of your value-add proposition Many aspiring Board Directors can tick a lot of the boxes when it comes to the criteria for Board candidacy, but the difference can be the fit to specific organisations. Your value addition can be identified across various facets, including your functional or industry expertise, your broader career achievement or success (such as major transactions, industry changes, working in different settings or ownership structures, etc), and personal or ethical alignment. Part of developing your individual proposition is sharing the unique elements of your profile with your networks, including the personal experiences and drivers that can be as important as your professional experience. Director mindset versus executive mindset New Directors often try to prove their executive and sometimes technical expertise, and need to make the shift to a mindset of governing over managing – “noses in and fingers out”. There’s a style of thinking from an executive career that allows you to draw on your experience and add real value to a Board setting. A change in mindset is required in order to add value in the critical areas for a Board member, such as setting and agreeing strategy alongside management, managing risk, and selecting the CEO. Conducting due diligence as you explore Board opportunities Due diligence is mutual – both for companies bringing on a Board member, and Board members looking to join an organisation. Exploration may include reading previous annual reports, talking to brokers or customers, and most importantly meeting the Chair, committee members, and other Directors if possible. Each Board has its own risk appetite, so it’s important to understand the values and risk alignment. Building relationships with other Board members to have open and honest conversations can take time and trust. “Boards are like a team – they don’t train together often, but they come together to play”. Our thanks to Michelle Gardiner , Managing Partner from our Board practice, for hosting this event, and to our guest speakers and attendees for their valuable contributions. Continue the conversation We'd love to hear your perspective on this topic! For further insights or to explore how Derwent can help you or your organisation, connect with our team at brisbane@derwentsearch.com.au . To express your interest for future Derwent events, please reach out to us at events@derwentsearch.com.au .
By Michelle Gardiner October 1, 2025
Australian boardrooms are confronting an unprecedented convergence of regulatory complexity, technological disruption, and stakeholder scrutiny. With mandatory climate reporting, rising cybersecurity threats, and AI disruption accelerating across industries, boards are making decisive talent moves to reposition their organisations. The focus is shifting from traditional oversight to strategic, innovative leadership in an increasingly complex environment. Moving from shareholder-only management to multi-stakeholder governance has become central to these strategies. Critical Talent Trends Artificial Intelligence: The New Governance Frontier – AI has emerged as perhaps the most significant governance challenge facing Australian boards with immediate implications. Board members need to ask two fundamental questions: What can AI do for our organisation? What risks does AI bring? Yet many Australian boards remain unprepared for voluntary AI reporting recommendations, opting to wait for potential mandatory frameworks in the future. This represents a fundamental shift from traditional technology oversight, now requiring directors capable of navigating complex AI implementation, risk assessment, and strategic deployment across business operations. Cybersecurity: Critical Board Responsibility – the cybersecurity landscape presents stark challenges that demand board-level attention, with Australian data revealing the magnitude of this threat: cybercrime reports reached over 87,400 in FY24, with incidents logged every six minutes. We're witnessing emerging directors with strong commercial experience and contemporary cyber skills securing board positions ahead of more experienced candidates who lack these specialised capabilities. This pattern suggests a growing recognition of cyber expertise as increasingly valuable in boardroom composition, reflecting the evolving threat environment and the rising importance placed on directors who possess relevant digital risk management capabilities . Climate Governance: From Aspiration to Action – climate governance has fundamentally shifted with the AICD's analysis showing that Australian boards are moving from aspiration and ambition to action, but progress is uneven. The regulatory framework is now concrete, with the introduction of mandatory climate reporting under globally-aligned standards representing a major milestone and requiring boards to increase oversight of climate risk, transition strategy, and scenario analysis. This transition demands directors who understand both the technical aspects of climate reporting and the strategic implications of sustainability transformation across business models. Board Diversity: Progress and Challenges – substantial progress has been made in gender diversity, with women representing nearly half of board appointments to ASX 300 boards over the last two years and holding 35% of ASX board positions overall. However, broader diversity challenges remain significant. There is still work to be done with 91% of ASX 300 Directors having an Anglo-Celtic background and only six openly LGBQTIA+ ASX directors. Consensus is forming around the AICD's and 30% Club's objective of securing 40/40/20 (40% men/40% women/20% of any gender) representation, but investors are applying pressure to see broader ethnic diversity that will better reflect businesses' customer bases and operational footprint. Shareholder Pressure – the shareholder activism landscape has intensified significantly, with Qantas’ shareholders rejecting the company's remuneration plan with a near-record 82.9% opposition following corporate scandals, demonstrating how reputation directly impacts board accountability. This escalating scrutiny requires directors who can navigate complex stakeholder relationships while maintaining strategic focus and delivering sustainable performance outcomes. Corporate Culture Accountability – corporate culture accountability has transformed from aspiration to a regulatory requirement. The events at Qantas, Mineral Resources, WiseTech and Nine Entertainment demonstrate that investors will hold boards accountable for cultural failures. Industry Super Funds have pioneered this change, with Aware Super requiring its fifty largest investments to answer eleven questions focusing specifically on conduct risk. This reflects broader stakeholder scrutiny, with over 10% of ASX 300 businesses receiving votes against their remuneration reports last year – the largest proportion since legislation was introduced.
More Posts